It Gets better！LGPT~美国众公众人物支持同性恋者获得保护和尊重！总统奥巴马更是通过美国全国性电视公开演讲，支持并保护同性恋的权益！【人人网 - 分享】
It Gets better！LGPT~美国众公众人物支持同性恋者获得保护和尊重！总统奥巴马更是通过美国全国性电视公开演讲，支持并保护同性恋的权益！
分享这个视频的人喜欢
分享这个视频的人也爱看
男男女女那些事，倒计时
开'整吧
快来看我呀嘻嘻嘻嘻
热门视频推荐
热门日志推荐
同类视频推荐
北京千橡网景科技发展有限公司：
文网文[号··京公网安备号·甲测资字
文化部监督电子邮箱：wlwh@··
文明办网文明上网举报电话： 举报邮箱：&&&&&&&&&&&&
请输入手机号，完成注册
请输入验证码
密码必须由6-20个字符组成
下载人人客户端
品评校花校草，体验校园广场蓝色-蓝色海岸
橙色-清幽秋意
红色-夏日夕阳红
绿色-绿色春意
后使用快捷导航没有帐号？
3&小时前5&小时前6&小时前昨天&15:18昨天&14:57
6773444742911018891
查看: 12327|回复: 11
泰国电影【会更好的（It Gets Better）】
本帖最后由 TFCW 于
21:05 编辑
讲述三段禁忌的爱情童话，一段是帅哥与人妖，一段是帅哥与帅哥，一段是和尚与和尚之间刻骨铭心的爱恋够新颖
本帖最后由 Hang 于
11:17 编辑
TFCW 在泰逗留大半個月, 連泰國電影也看了許多套吧!
這套: 會更好的( IT GETS BETTER) 是一套有爭論性電影,在日終於在全泰上演, 是打破禁忌, 敏感議題.
導演 TANWARIN SUKKHAPISIT 是変性人, 專拍変性人心理電影. 上一部: INSECTS IN BACKYARD 被查禁. 今次又大胆演出三部曲: 1/ 老年变性人愛上年輕修車技工帥哥 2/ 俊男愛上父親的人妖夜總會開車的変性司機 3/ 父親為了要娘型靚仔皃子有男子漢氣慨, 要送他入寺廟捱苦磨鍊, 乖仔怕被人欺負, 寧死不從, 忽然有健美和尚, 從身旁誦經走過, 小哥眼前一亮, 馬上答應長伴青燈了. 結果發生僧侣師兄弟同性相恋. 全片帥哥一大堆, 目不睱給. 片尾曲是由跨性別, 超人氣歌手BELLE NANTITA, 蘯氣迴腸, 賺同志們眼淚的, 唱出名曲: 我不曾奢望你愛我.
本帖最后由 Hang 于
11:15 编辑
附上 泰國電影: 會更好的( IT GETS BETTER)&&劇照, 給各位欣賞, 更多謝 TFCW 兄介紹:
第一個故事: 有錢老変性人愛上年輕修車技工帥哥
egrbv.jpg (63.31 KB, 下载次数: 117)
10:44 上传
etibe.jpg (38.19 KB, 下载次数: 119)
10:44 上传
第二個故事: 少東愛上了家中夜總會的変性司機
eitgetbetter.jpg (31.21 KB, 下载次数: 123)
10:44 上传
第三個故事: 愛扮女性的少年被迫削髪剃度為僧
SSCN1136.JPG (43.95 KB, 下载次数: 118)
10:44 上传
SSCN1111.JPG (27.05 KB, 下载次数: 115)
10:44 上传
SSCN1106.JPG (24.08 KB, 下载次数: 126)
10:44 上传
小和尙因禍得福, 有大師兄伴食, 陪睡.
ehtg.jpg (35.79 KB, 下载次数: 115)
10:44 上传
照片右方穿白衣的兩位便是未落髪的和尚啦!
efe.jpg (52.9 KB, 下载次数: 127)
10:44 上传
有更多俊男出现呀!
SSCN1132.JPG (46.25 KB, 下载次数: 120)
10:44 上传
SSCN1127.JPG (23.93 KB, 下载次数: 122)
10:44 上传
egtr.jpg (28.04 KB, 下载次数: 117)
10:44 上传
eit.jpg (18.17 KB, 下载次数: 119)
10:44 上传
完整的影片呢？
还挺好看的，看到最后才发觉搞笑之后是令人伤感
好片子，感谢推荐与分享{:soso_e100:}
加纳俊 发表于
好片子，感谢推荐与分享
昨天刚看完，看得有些感动，所以就分享给大家看，每个同志都有自己的喜与悲，一生或许就是这样度过了
本帖最后由 Hang 于
23:43 编辑
這部片子長達2小時(133分鐘), 盡是人情冷暖, 演員拍得很盡心盡力, 拍完了依依不捨, 觀眾亦然, 再看多幾張照片, 也許各位在曼谷街頭會碰見他們呢!
efrbv.jpg (66.43 KB, 下载次数: 116)
23:31 上传
圖中上一行站在正中手拿拍板的, 是変性導演 TANWARIN
ehgv.jpg (56.12 KB, 下载次数: 120)
23:31 上传
efrb.jpg (32.96 KB, 下载次数: 122)
23:31 上传
egtbc.jpg (40.19 KB, 下载次数: 126)
23:31 上传
看完泰国电影《It gets better》后，有点感慨……
看这个电影原先是被它敏感的题材吸引的，里面有提及同性恋、变性、僧侣、人妖等，很禁忌，也很诱惑，就像伊甸园的苹果一样……
电影貌似讲述3段禁忌的爱情，但其实是通过3个不同的故事来讲述一个变性人Din的人生旅程……
开头，3个故事互相独立，但是随着故事慢慢的展开，故事之间的联系巧妙地接上了……而且毫不刻意，就像蜘蛛的网，在黑暗中看不见，但是随着阳光的照射与转移，蜘蛛丝逐条逐条慢慢地显现在眼底……当完全看见时，人已经被铺天盖地的网网住了……不得不让人感叹导演的匠心独运。
第一个故事讲的是年轻时的Din，很帅气可爱的一个男孩，但有着女装癖。在一次穿女装时被父亲发现了。后来父亲送他去僧庙里，貌似是泰国的传统，男孩到了一定年纪要出家，来修行，来锻炼内心，让男孩长大成男人。在这里，年轻的Din喜欢上了自己的师兄。Din没有向师兄剖白自己的心意，但是却很依赖他的师兄。Din的师兄是一个严守戒律的和尚，他可能已察觉Din的心思，但是他却告诉Din，要学会压制内心的私念，抑制欲望，化解困惑。人无法随心所欲想要什么就能得到什么，必须学会舍弃自己的部分欲望以满足他人的愿望。Din很痛苦，但还是听从了师兄的训诫，去压抑自己想成为一名女性的欲望，以满足父亲的愿望；去压抑自己对师兄的爱慕。
后来，Din长大后娶了一个女人，这是他第一个也是唯一一个喜欢的女人。这个女人后来怀上了他的孩子。后来，这个女人无意中发现了他有女装癖，和他离了婚，远走国外，生下一个帅气的男孩。
第二个故事讲的是一个帅气的男孩Tonmai从国外回到泰国，想卖了父亲留给他的人妖酒吧（这个酒吧其实就是Din变性后开的，也就是说这个帅气的男孩Tonmai是Din的孩子。这个酒吧后来亦成为了一众人妖的家……）。在这里，直男Tonmai爱上了一个人妖Tonlew……
第三个故事讲的是Saitarn的故事（但Saitarn其实就是变了性的Din，这是电影中比较隐晦的）。退休后的Saitarn（即Din）回到了故乡，本想偷偷伴着年老的父亲。但在这里，他又爱上了一个比他年轻的男人，一方面，他担心男人会嫌弃自己是一个年老的人妖，另一方面，他又担心这个男人还喜欢着他的前女友。后来，他在一次偷偷探望父亲的时候遇上父亲被土匪打劫，本想赶走土匪的Din被土匪用枪打死了。
从电影中，可以看到Din的一生在抑制自己和解放欲望的矛盾中沉浮，从压抑到释放……而Tonmai可以看成是父亲Din的延续，他爱上了人妖Tonlew，但同时内心又为自己的性向挣扎……
电影中的气氛不是一味的压抑，而亦有着暖色。虽然故事混杂着展开，但主线展现给人们的是从压抑到解放，亦照应了电影的名字：It gets better……同时亦告诉所有看电影的人，即使自己与别人不同，亦不需要太痛苦，因为这是人生的一个过程，finally，it gets better。
可能，这部电影有些批判佛家的戒律中压抑自己的欲望去成全别人愿望的思想，希望每个人能够找回真正的自己。
--转自网络
本帖最后由 Hang 于
12:17 编辑
EKINSUNSH 兄, 你的詳細分折劇情以及 TFCW 兄介紹此片, 使我如沐春風, 在此謝了. 我一口氣登出了7集: HANG之旅. 正是集中了導演, 拍攝, 編劇, 演員於一身, 苦不堪言. 但是得到各位在百忙之中, 給我鼓掌捧場, 我亦滿足了, 我亦給 IT GETS BETTER 的上上下下工作人員致敬.
egrfv.jpg (58.48 KB, 下载次数: 123)
12:16 上传
Powered by Discuz! X3.1【欢迎关注佳人官方微信】佳人官方微信出炉啦，
您正在阅读： &
& 跟克林顿学英语：精彩演讲助选奥巴马(视频)
前美国总统克林顿在民主党党代会上发表演讲力挺奥巴马，非常精彩的演讲！超时20分钟，但是掌声可能就接近20分钟了。喜欢学英语演讲的朋友，不妨花50分钟学习克林顿的口才、幽默、魅力，也可以见证美国总统选举的过程。
前美国总统克林顿精彩演讲助选奥巴马视频：
克林顿提名奥巴马演讲(中英文版word文档)下载：
克林顿提名奥巴马演讲(中英文版).docx
克林顿提名奥巴马演讲全文（英文）：
We’re here to nominate a President, and I’ve got one in mind.
I want to nominate a man whose own life has known its fair share of adversity and uncertainty. A man who ran for President to change the course of an already weak economy and then just six weeks before the election, saw it suffer the biggest collapse since the Great Depression. A man who stopped the slide into depression and put us on the long road to recovery, knowing all the while that no matter how many jobs were created and saved, there were still millions more waiting, trying to feed their children and keep their hopes alive.
I want to nominate a man cool on the outside but burning for America on the inside. A man who believes we can build a new American Dream economy driven by innovation and creativity, education and cooperation. A man who had the good sense to marry Michelle Obama.
I want Barack Obama to be the next President of the United States and I proudly nominate him as the standard bearer of the Democratic Party.
In Tampa, we heard a lot of talk about how the President and the Democrats don’t believe in free enterprise and individual initiative, how we want everyone to be dependent on the government, how bad we are for the economy.
The Republican narrative is that all of us who amount to anything are completely self-made. One of our greatest Democratic Chairmen, Bob Strauss, used to say that every politician wants you to believe he was born in a log cabin he built himself, but it ain’t so.
We Democrats think the country works better with a strong middle class, real opportunities for poor people to work their way into it and a relentless focus on the future, with business and government working together to promote growth and broadly shared prosperity. We think “we’re all in this together” is a better philosophy than “you’re on your own.”
Who’s right? Well since 1961, the Republicans have held the White House 28 years, the Democrats 24. In those 52 years, our economy produced 66 million private sector jobs. What’s the jobs score? Republicans 24 million, Democrats 42 million!
It turns out that advancing equal opportunity and economic empowerment is both morally right and good economics, because discrimination, poverty and ignorance restrict growth, while investments in education, infrastructure and scientific and technological research increase it, creating more good jobs and new wealth for all of us.
Though I often disagree with Republicans, I never learned to hate them the way the far right that now controls their party seems to hate President Obama and the Democrats. After all, President Eisenhower sent federal troops to my home state to integrate Little Rock Central High and built the interstate highway system. And as governor, I worked with President Reagan on welfare reform and with President George H.W. Bush on national education goals.
I am grateful to President George W. Bush for PEPFAR, which is saving the lives of millions of people in poor countries and to both Presidents Bush for the work we’ve done together after the
South Asia tsunami, Hurricane Katrina and the Haitian earthquake.
Through my foundation, in America and around the world, I work with Democrats, Republicans and Independents who are focused on solving problems and seizing opportunities, not fighting each other.
When times are tough, constant conflict may be good politics but in the real world, cooperation works better. After all, nobody’s right all the time, and a broken clock is right twice a day. All of us are destined to live our lives between those two extremes. Unfortunately, the faction that now dominates the Republican Party doesn’t see it that way. They think government is the enemy, and compromise is weakness.
One of the main reasons America should re-elect President Obama is that he is still committed to cooperation. He appointed Republican Secretaries of Defense, the Army and Transportation.
He appointed a Vice President who ran against him in 2008, and trusted him to oversee the successful end of the war in Iraq and the implementation of the recovery act. And Joe Biden did a great job with both. He appointed Cabinet members who supported Hillary in the primaries. Heck, he even appointed Hillary! I’m so proud of her and grateful to our entire national security team for all they’ve done to make us safer and stronger and to build a world with more partners and fewer enemies. I’m also grateful to the young men and women who serve our country in the military and to Michelle Obama and Jill Biden for supporting military families when their loved ones are overseas and for helping our veterans, when they come home bearing the wounds of war, or needing help with education, housing, and jobs.
President Obama’s record on national security is a tribute to his strength, and judgment, and to his preference for inclusion and partnership over partisanship.
He also tried to work with Congressional Republicans on Health Care, debt reduction, and jobs, but that didn’t work out so well. Probably because, as the Senate Republican leader, in a remarkable moment of candor, said two years before the election, their number one priority was not to put America back to work, but to put President Obama out of work. Senator, I hate to break it to you, but we’re going to keep President Obama on the job!
In Tampa, the Republican argument against the President’s re-election was pretty simple: we left him a total mess, he hasn’t cleaned it up fast enough, so fire him and put us back in.
In order to look like an acceptable alternative to President Obama, they couldn’t say much about the ideas they have offered over the last two years. You see they want to go back to the same old policies that got us into trouble in the first place: to cut taxes for high income Americans even more than President B to get rid of those pesky financial regulations designed to prevent another crash and proh to increase defense spending two trillion dollars more than the Pentagon has requested without saying what they’l to make enormous cuts in the rest of the budget, especially programs that help the middle class and poor kids. As another President once said – there they go again.
I like the argument for President Obama’s re-election a lot better. He inherited a deeply damaged economy, put a floor under the crash, began the long hard road to recovery, and laid the foundation for a modern, more well-balanced economy that will produce millions of good new jobs, vibrant new businesses, and lots of new wealth for the innovators. Are we where we want to be? No. Is the President satisfied? No. Are we better off than we were when he took office, with an economy in free fall, losing 750,000 jobs a month. The answer is YES.
I understand the challenge we face. I know many Americans are still angry and frustrated with the economy. Though employment is growing, banks are beginning to lend and even housing prices are picking up a bit, too many people don’t feel it.
I experienced the same thing in 1994 and early 1995. Our policies were working and the economy was growing but most people didn’t feel it yet. By 1996, the economy was roaring, halfway through the longest peacetime expansion in American history.
President Obama started with a much weaker economy than I did. No President – not me or any of my predecessors could have repaired all the damage in just four years. But conditions are improving and if you’ll renew the President’s contract you will feel it.
I believe that with all my heart.
President Obama’s approach embodies the values, the ideas, and the direction America must take to build a 21st century version of the American Dream in a nation of shared opportunities, shared prosperity and shared responsibilities.
So back to the story. In 2010, as the President’s recovery program kicked in, the job losses stopped and things began to turn around.
The Recovery Act saved and created millions of jobs and cut taxes for 95% of the American people. In the last 29 months the economy has produced about 4.5 million private sector jobs. But last year, the Republicans blocked the President’s jobs plan costing the economy more than a million new jobs. So here’s another jobs score: President Obama plus 4.5 million, Congressional Republicans zero.
Over that same period, more than more than 500,000 manufacturing jobs have been created under President Obama – the first time manufacturing jobs have increased since the 1990s.
The auto industry restructuring worked. It saved more than a million jobs, not just at GM, Chrysler and their dealerships, but in auto parts manufacturing all over the country. That’s why even auto-makers that weren’t part of the deal supported it. They needed to save the suppliers too. Like I said, we’re all in this together.
Now there are 250,000 more people working in the auto industry than the day the companies were restructured. Governor Romney opposed the plan to save GM and Chrysler. So here’s another jobs score: Obama two hundred and fifty thousand, Romney, zero.
The agreement the administration made with management, labor and environmental groups to double car mileage over the next few years is another good deal: it will cut your gas bill in half, make us more energy independent, cut greenhouse gas emissions, and add another 500,000 good jobs.
President Obama’s “all of the above” energy plan is helping too – the boom in oil and gas production combined with greater energy efficiency has driven oil imports to a near 20 year low and natural gas production to an all time high. Renewable energy production has also doubled.
We do need more new jobs, lots of them, but there are already more than three million jobs open and unfilled in America today, mostly because the applicants don’t have the required skills. We have to prepare more Americans for the new jobs that are being created in a world fueled by new technology. That’s why investments in our people are more important than ever. The President has supported community colleges and employers in working together to train people for open jobs in their communities. And, after a decade in which exploding college costs have increased the drop-out rate so much that we’ve fallen to 16th in the world in the percentage of our young adults with college degrees, his student loan reform lowers the cost of federal student loans and even more important, gives students the right to repay the loans as a fixed percentage of their incomes for up to 20 years. That means no one will have to drop-out of college for fear they can’t repay their debt, and no one will have to turn down a job, as a teacher, a police officer or a small town doctor because it doesn’t pay enough to make the debt payments. This will change the future for young Americans.
I know we’re better off because President Obama made these decisions.
That brings me to health care.
The Republicans call it Obamacare and say it’s a government takeover of health care that they’ll repeal. Are they right? Let’s look at what’s happened so far. Individuals and businesses have secured more than a billion dollars in refunds from their insurance premiums because the new law requires 80% to 85% of your premiums to be spent on health care, not profits or promotion. Other insurance companies have lowered their rates to meet the requirement. More than 3 million young people between 19 and 25 are insured for the first time because their parents can now carry them on family policies. Millions of seniors are receiving preventive care including breast cancer screenings and tests for heart problems. Soon the insurance companies, not the government, will have millions of new customers many of them middle class people with pre-existing conditions. And for the last two years, health care spending has grown under 4%, for the first time in 50 years.
So are we all better off because President Obama fought for it and passed it? You bet we are.
There were two other attacks on the President in Tampa that deserve an answer. Both Governor Romney and Congressman Ryan attacked the President for allegedly robbing Medicare of 716 billion dollars. Here’s what really happened. There were no cuts to benefits. None. What the President did was save money by cutting unwarranted subsidies to providers and insurance companies that weren’t making people any healthier. He used the saving to close the donut hole in the Medicare drug program, and to add eight years to the life of the Medicare Trust Fund. It’s now solvent until 2024. So President Obama and the Democrats didn’t weaken Medicare, they strengthened it.
When Congressman Ryan looked into the TV camera and attacked President Obama’s “biggest coldest power play” in raiding Medicare, I didn’t know whether to laugh or cry. You see, that 716 billion dollars is exactly the same amount of Medicare savings Congressman Ryan had in his own budget.
At least on this one, Governor Romney’s been consistent. He wants to repeal the savings and give the money back to the insurance companies, re-open the donut hole and force seniors to pay more for drugs, and reduce the life of the Medicare Trust Fund by eight years. So now if he’s elected and does what he promised Medicare will go broke by 2016. If that happens, you won’t have to wait until their voucher program to begins in 2023 to see the end Medicare as we know it.
But it gets worse. They also want to block grant Medicaid and cut it by a third over the coming decade. Of course, that will hurt poor kids, but that’s not all. Almost two-thirds of Medicaid is spent on nursing home care for seniors and on people with disabilities, including kids from middle class families, with special needs like, Downs syndrome or Autism. I don’t know how those families are going to deal with it. We can’t let it happen.
Now let’s look at the Republican charge that President Obama wants to weaken the work requirements in the welfare reform bill I signed that moved millions of people from welfare to work.
Here’s what happened. When some Republican governors asked to try new ways to put people on welfare back to work, the Obama Administration said they would only do it if they had a credible plan to increase employment by 20%. You hear that? More work. So the claim that President Obama weakened welfare reform’s work requirement is just not true. But they keep running ads on it. As their campaign pollster said “we’re not going to let our campaign be dictated by fact checkers.” Now that is true. I couldn’t have said it better myself – I just hope you remember that every time you see the ad.
Let’s talk about the debt. We have to deal with it or it will deal with us. President Obama has offered a plan with 4 trillion dollars in debt reduction over a decade, with two and a half dollars of spending reductions for every one dollar of revenue increases, and tight controls on future spending. It’s the kind of balanced approach proposed by the bipartisan Simpson-Bowles commission.
I think the President’s plan is better than the Romney plan, because the Romney plan fails the first test of fiscal responsibility: The numbers don’t add up.
It’s supposed to be a debt reduction plan but it begins with five trillion dollars in tax cuts over a ten-year period. That makes the debt hole bigger before they even start to dig out. They say they’ll make it up by eliminating loopholes in the tax code. When you ask “which loopholes and how much?,” they say “See me after the election on that.” People ask me all the time how we delivered four surplus budgets. What new ideas did we bring? I always give a one-word answer: arithmetic. If they stay with a 5 trillion dollar tax cut in a debt reduction plan – the – arithmetic tells us that one of three things will happen: 1) they’ll have to eliminate so many deductions like the ones for home mortgages and charitable giving that middle class families will see their tax bill go up two thousand dollars year while people making over 3 million dollars a year get will still get a 250,000 or 2) they’ll have to cut so much spending that they’ll obliterate the budget for our national parks, for ensuring clean air, clean water, safe food, or they’ll cut way back on Pell Grants, college loans, early childhood education and other programs that help middle class families and poor children, not to mention cutting investments in roads, bridges, science, technology
or 3) they’ll do what they’ve been doing for thirty plus years now – cut taxes more than they cut spending, explode the debt, and weaken the economy. Remember, Republican economic policies quadrupled the debt before I took office and doubled it after I left. We simply can’t afford to double-down on trickle-down.
President Obama’s plan cuts the debt, honors our values, and brightens the future for our children, our families and our nation.
My fellow Americans, you have to decide what kind of country you want to live in. If you want a you’re on your own, winner take all society you should support the Republican ticket. If you want a country of shared opportunities and shared responsibilities – a “we’re all in it together” society, you should vote for Barack Obama and Joe Biden. If you want every American to vote and you think its wrong to change voting procedures just to reduce the turnout of younger, poorer, minority and disabled voters, you should support Barack Obama. If you think the President was right to open the doors of American opportunity to young immigrants brought here as children who want to go to college or serve in the military, you should vote for Barack Obama. If you want a future of shared prosperity, where the middle class is growing and poverty is declining, where the American Dream is alive and well, and where the United States remains the leading force for peace and prosperity in a highly competitive world, you should vote for Barack Obama. I love our country – and I know we’re coming back. For more than 200 years, through every crisis, we’ve always come out stronger than we went in. And we will again as long as we do it together. We champion the cause for which our founders pledged their lives, their fortunes, their sacred honor – to form a more perfect union.
If that’s what you believe, if that’s what you want, we have to re-elect President Barack Obama.
God Bless You – God Bless America.
中新社华盛顿9月6日电 (记者 吴庆才)5日晚，美国民主党全国代表大会出现尴尬的一幕：在连续三次口头表决中赞成和反对票数几乎相当的情况下，会议主席仍“假装”以三分之二多数通过党 纲。这个混乱的画面被美国主流媒体反复回放。就在这尴尬时刻，满头银发的前总统比尔 克林顿扮演了“救火队长”的角色，他风度翩翩地走上舞台时，所有的尴尬和分歧顿时烟消云散。
所有人都在等待倾听这位已卸任12年的“宫外总统”如何推销奥巴马，最重要的是如何讲述过去四年的故事，如何回答罗姆尼抛出的问题：“你是否比四年前过得更好？”
这个故事不好讲，因为眼下奥巴马成绩单上写着如下几个数据：8.3%的失业率、1.7%的经济增长率和创纪录的16万亿美元的政府公债。
然而，克林顿用一场经典演讲证明了他仍是当今美国最伟大的政治家和演说家之一。他用细节、事实和逻辑，将复杂的经济社会问题，用通俗易懂又不失幽默的语言圆融练达地加以解释，将奥巴马和罗姆尼不同的执政纲领及图景泾渭分明地呈现出来。
克林顿几无遗漏地评价了奥巴马任内的重要工作，从救援汽车行业到医保法案，从提高教师工资水平到降低学生贷款利率，从美国军人及其家属的工作安置到美国的国防和外交，他证明了奥巴马的每一项行动都经得起这一考验：美国人比四年前过得更好。
他首先用一组数据回击了民主党不会搞经济的说法：“从1961年至今，共和党人执掌白宫28年，民主党人执掌了24年，这期间共和党只创造了2400万个就业机会，而民主党创造了4200万个就业机会。”
克林顿说：“共和党攻击奥巴马的理由很简单，那就是他们给我们留下一堆烂摊子，然后反过来说奥巴马清理垃圾的速度不够快，因此应该解雇他，让共和党人重新回来执政。”
他提醒，奥巴马上台时美国经济正处于“自由落体”，GDP缩水了9%，每个月丢掉75万个工作岗位。他说：“没有一位总统，包括我和之前所有总统，能够用四年修补所有残局。”
克林顿说：“奥巴马上台时美国经济已伤痕累累，但他阻止了经济进一步崩溃，开启了漫长而艰难的复苏之路，为一个更现代、更加平衡的美国经济奠定了基础。”
“总统满足于此了吗？当然没有。但我们的日子是否比他上任时更好了？”克林顿说，“答案是肯定的”。
他还将目前经济的困境归咎于共和党缺乏合作精神，认为奥巴马应当选的理由之一是他致力于合作。“他任命了共和党人做国防部长、交通部长，他任命2008 年的竞选对手拜登为副总统，他任命支持希拉里的人为内阁成员。”克林顿幽默地说：“哎呀，他甚至任命希拉里为国务卿。”
克林顿对选民说：“如果你希望生活在一个全靠自己、赢家通吃的社会，那么请你支持共和党，但如果你希望生活在一个公民能够分享繁荣和责任的国家，那么请你把票投给奥巴马。”
当克林顿站在台上阐述这一切时，显然是有说服力的。这位被认为“最擅长经济”的总统，在主政8年内使美国经历了历史上和平时期持续时间最长的一次经济发展，实现了自杜鲁门以来首次财政盈余，失业率由7%下降至4%。
一些美国专家称，这是美国历史上最伟大的演讲之一，克林顿用48分钟时间说明了奥巴马四年没说清楚的问题。
他的成功在于，即便打了对手一巴掌，对方仍毕恭毕敬。共和党人到目前不但没有反击克林顿的言论，反而与民主党争相打起了“克林顿牌”，罗姆尼的发言人亨尼伯格说：“当涉及到国家经济时，奥巴马就不能与克林顿总统相提并论。”
他的成功在于，即便发表了超时超长演讲，依然大受欢迎。据披露，克林顿原定的讲话稿为3279个词，但他不按提示器念稿，多发挥了2619个词。在长达48分钟的演讲中，他赢得了105次欢呼和33次笑声。用美国媒体的话说，就像一场“摇滚音乐会”。
克林顿证明了他的光环依旧耀眼，12年前他离任时的支持率达65%；12年后，他最近的支持率仍高达66%，而这远高于奥巴马的47%和罗姆尼的46%。
无疑，克林顿已成了奥巴马倚重的“救火队长”，即便共和党策略家亚历克斯?卡斯特利亚诺斯也承认：“如果奥巴马连任成功，我认为克林顿的演说是一个很好的理由。”
不过，克林顿能否“救火”成功最终仍取决于奥巴马本身的表现，特别是在6日晚上的提名演说中，他能否拿出让人信服的未来蓝图至关重要。
曾做过里根总统助手的历史学家杰弗里 罗德在接受媒体采访时说：“奥巴马需要克林顿，就像老布什需要里根一样。但即使里根也救不了布什，所以我不确定克林顿能否救得了奥巴马。”
| 京ICP备 | 京公网安备64